Joseph Nye’s Concept of Soft Power in Foreign Scientific Discourse: Interpretation and Criticism2
Keywords:
J. Nye, soft power, hard power, smart power, theory of international relations, neorealismAbstract
The concept of soft power which was developed at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries by one of the leaders of the neoliberal approaches in the modern theory of international relations J.S. Nye Jr. has recently gained more and more sustained interest from the domestic academic and expert community. So far, however, Russian researchers are significantly inferior to their Western colleagues in studying the problem. This circumstance requires further research in this extremely relevant scientific area. The article analyzes the key theses of the concept of soft power and the reflection on them by prominent representatives of foreign scientific discourse. A systematic approach and comparative analysis are used as research methods. It is emphasized that despite the widespread recognition of Nye’s merits, Western political scientists reproached their colleague for the insufficient rigor of his works, their academic and conceptual vagueness, inaccuracy of key definitions, the lack of a clearly defined set of resources, tools and mechanisms for implementing the policy of soft power in the international arena. The discussions unfolded on the question of soft power and hard power ratio, as well as the assessment of real results of applying the soft power strategy in practice. As a result, it is concluded that foreign scientists have a lot of questions both to the theoretical and methodological components of this concept and to its practical side. Nevertheless, the significance of the Nye’s concept for the development of the international relations theory is extremely great. It is J. Nye who managed to create a fairly complete and elaborated concept, which, despite serious and sometimes fair criticism from other reputable scientists, was not only accepted in the scientific community, but also adopted by the political elites of the leading powers of our time.
References
Галларотти Дж. Как измерять мягкую силу в международных отношениях // Полис. Политические исследования. 2020. № 1. С. 89–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.01.07.
Наумов А.О. «Мягкая сила», «цветные революции» и технологии смены политических режимов в начале XXI века. М.: АРГАМАК-МЕДИА, 2016.
Неймарк М.А. «Мягкая сила» в мировой политике. М.: Издательско-торговая корпорация «Дашков и Ко», 2020.
Паршин П.Б. «Мягкая сила» в лабиринте дискуссий. М.: Издательство «МГИМО-Университет», 2020. Soft Power: теория, ресурсы, дискурс / под ред. О.Ф. Русаковой. Екатеринбург: Издательский Дом
«Дискурс-Пи», 2015. Fan Y. Soft Power: Power of Attraction or Confusion? // Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. 2008. № 4. P. 147–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2008.4.
Gallarotti G. Soft Power: What It Is, Why It’s Important, and the Conditions under Which It Can Be Effectively Used // Journal of Political Power. Vol. 4. Is. 1. P. 25–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886.
Gray C. Hard Power and Soft Power: The Utility of Military Force as an Instrument of Policy in the 21st Century. Carlisle, Pa.: Strategic Studies Institute, 2011.
Hall T. An Unclear Attraction: A Critical Examination of Soft Power as an Analytical Category // The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2010. Vol. 3. Is. 2. P. 189–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq005.
Kounalakis M., Simonyi A. The Hard Truth about Soft Power. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press, 2011.
Lock E. Soft Power and Strategy: Developing a Strategic Concept of Power // Soft Power and US Foreign Policy Theoretical, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives / ed. by I. Parmar, M. Cox. London: Routledge, 2010. P. 32–50.
Lukes S. Power and the Battle for Hearts and Minds: On the Bluntness of Soft Power // Power in World Politics / ed. by F. Berenskoetter, M.J. Williams. London: Routledge, 2007. P. 83–97.
Mattern J.B. Why Soft Power Isn’t So Soft: Representational Force and the Sociolinguistic Construction of Attraction in World Politics // Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2005. Vol. 33. Is. 3. P. 583–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031601.
Mingjiang L. Soft Power: China’s Emerging Strategy in International Politics. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2009.
Noya J. The Symbolic Power of Nations // ELCANO Royal Institute Working Paper 35/2005. 2005. URL: http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/589286804f018367b397f 73170bae ad1/035-2005-WP.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=589286804f018367b397f73170baead1.
Nye J.S. Soft Power // Foreign Policy. 1990. No 80. P. 153–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580.
Nye J.S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.
Nye J.S. Notes for a Soft Power Research Agenda // Power in World Politics / ed. by F. Berenskoetter, M.J. Williams. London: Routledge, 2007a. P. 162–172.
Nye J.S. The Place of Soft Power in State-Based Conflict Management // Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World / ed. by C.A. Crocker, F.O. Hampson, P. Aall. Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2007b. P. 389–400.
Nye J.S. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2010.
Rosel L., Miskimmon A., O’Loughlin B. Strategic Narrative: A New Means to Understand Soft Power // Media, War and Conflict. 2014. Vol. 7. Is. 1. P. 70–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635213516696.
Vuving A. L. How Soft Power Works // Paper presented at the Panel “Soft Power and Smart Power”. American Political Science Association annual meeting. Toronto. September 3. 2009. URL: https://apcss.org/Publications/Vuving%20How%20soft%20power%20works%20APSA%202009.pdf.
Zahran G., Ramos L. From Hegemony to Soft Power: Implications of a Conceptual Change // Soft Power and US Foreign Policy Theoretical, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives / ed. by I. Parmar, M. Cox. London: Routledge, 2010. P. 11–31