Systemic Constructs of International Security: Societal Change Agents as Conflict Resolution

Systemic Constructs of International Security: Societal Change Agents as Conflict Resolution

Authors

Keywords:

International security, social development, inequality, military risk, conflict resolution, elitology, military studies

Abstract

This article proposes systemic constructs of international security (SCIS) to determine the degree of international tensions in the world, based on several types of data: indicators on the social development of states; the degree of resource concentration amongst elites; military and information power. The research methodology includes a systemic approach that makes explicit the interrelation of economic, political, social, and military factors, thereby producing a stabilization or destabilization of the international situation. In assessing the increasingly complex reality of international security, a dialectical method was used. SCIS can be defined as the minimum set of interrelated parameters of the state (economic, political, military, cultural, scientific, environmental), keeping them in a ratio that meets the demands of social development while minimizing the risks of destabilizing social systems. Finally, the authors made a preliminary SCIS assessment for six countries: five (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) have officially announced successful nuclear weapons tests. The sixth, India, has a nuclear program as well as significant economic potential and the second largest population in the world. Based on the analysis, the authors offer proposals for determining a state’s military danger index. The task of democratic institutions is to develop and improve an analytical model so as to combine the monitoring of dangerous trends with practical readiness to overcome them globally. The question of what socio-political actors can provide for the SCIS is open for discussion.

Author Biographies

Evgeny N. Pashentsev, Diplomatic Academy

DSc (History), Professor, Institute of Contemporary International Studies, Diplomatic Academy, Moscow, Russian Federation.

 icspsc@mail.ru

Darya Yu. Bazarkina, Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DSc (Political Science), Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation. 

bazarkina-icspsc@yandex.ru

Matthew D. Crosston, Austin Peay State University

PhD, Professor, Inaugural Director, Institute for National Security and Military Studies, Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, USA. 

crosstonm@apsu.edu

References

Базаркина Д.Ю. Эволюция подходов к противодействию гибридным угрозам в стратегическом планировании ЕС // Современная Европа. 2021. № 6 (106). С. 133–143. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope62021133143

Пашенцев Е.Н. Провокация как элемент стратегической коммуникации США: опыт Украины // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2014. № 44. С. 149–175.

Bergsten C.F. The United States vs. China: The Quest for Global Economic Leadership. Cambridge, Melford: Polity Press, 2022.

Bongiovanni F. The Decline and Fall of Europe. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Bulmer-Thomas V. Empire in Retreat: The Past, Present, and Future of the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

China’s Global Engagement: Cooperation, Competition, and Influence in the 21st Century / ed. by J. deLisle and A. Goldstein. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2017.

Crosston M., Pashentsev E. Russian Security Cannot Be Anti-Russian // The Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC). 2022. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/russian-security-cannot-be-anti-russian/

Erler E. The United States in Crisis: Citizenship, Immigration, and the Nation State. New York, London: Encounter Books, 2022.

Giles K., Ellis R. The Rise of Russia — The Turning Point for Russian Foreign Policy. Praha: Madison & Adams Press, 2017.

Marche S. Next Civil War: Dispatches from the American Future. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2022.

Pashentsev E. About the Constructs of International Security: Myth or Future Realities of International Relations (manuscript) // Research Seminar by International Center for Socio-Political Studies and Consulting (ICSPSC). Moscow, January 17, 2022a.

Pashentsev E. The US Strategic Provocations before and during the Olympic Games: The Stakes Are Growing. Moscow: International Center for Social and Political Studies and Consulting, 2022b.

Petras J. US Imperialism: The Changing Dynamics of Global Power (Globalization, Crises, and Change). New York, Abingdon: Routledge, 2019.

Theorising the Crises of the European Union / ed. by N. Brack, S. Gürkan. Abingdon: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2021.

Walter B. How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them. New York: Crown, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Systemic Constructs of International Security: Societal Change Agents as Conflict Resolution. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 93, 81-95. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/167

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Systemic Constructs of International Security: Societal Change Agents as Conflict Resolution. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 93, 81-95. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/167

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Similar Articles

31-40 of 321

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...