Государственное управление. Электронный вестник

Russia’s Climate Policy Objectives in the Context of Global Challenges and Economic Interests

Authors

  • Alexander S. Gruzdev

    Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-112-2025-161-174

Keywords:

Climate objectives, climate policy, climate policy motives, carbon neutrality, climate threats and benefits, carbon regulation.

Abstract

The article explores the motives and related objectives of Russia’s climate policy in the context of increasing global challenges and the need to ensure national economic interests. The relevance of the study is defined by the recent development of various factors, including the increasing complexity of the international climate agenda, the development of negative consequences of climate change, the significant growth of the global clean energy market, the impact of which should be taken into account to determine a balanced approach to the goals of the country’s climate policy. The aim of the work is to identify possible priorities for Russia’s climate policy based on an analysis of the relevance for Russia of the key motives that determine national climate strategies in countries around the world. The work used analyses of open data, reports of international analytical agencies and Russian authorities, and studied regulatory legal documents of Russia and other countries. The study revealed motives specific to Russia, such as the strengthening of international carbon regulation that affects Russian exporters, the high dependence of the country’s economy on oil and gas, the acute problem of air pollution in certain regions, and increasing vulnerability to climate change. Based on these motives, the objectives of Russian climate policy are proposed taking into account the balance between the need for prompt response to external challenges, utilisation of national advantages, and long-term structural transformations in the context of uncertainty in the global climate agenda. Prospective directions for further research include the development of the most relevant tasks that need to be solved to achieve each of the objectives defined in the paper, as well as the assessment of the effectiveness of such tasks.

Author Biography

References

Порфирьев Б.Н., Данилов-Данильян В.И., Катцов В.М., Ксенофонтов М.Ю., Ревич Б.А., Школьник И.А., Клюева М.В., Павлова Т.В., Колпаков А.Ю., Ползиков Д.А., Елисеев Д.О., Терентьев Н.Е., Рудакова Н.Л. Изменение климата и экономика России: тенденции, сценарии, прогнозы. М.: Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Научный консультант», 2022.

Порфирьев Б.Н., Колпаков А.Ю., Елисеев Д.О., Саенко В.В., Ползиков Д.А., Лазеева Е.А., Бирюков Е.С. Экономические эффекты изменения климата в России // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2025a. № 2(209). С. 20–36. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-209-20-36

Порфирьев Б.Н., Колпаков А.Ю., Лазеева Е.А. Оценка влияния изменения климата на экономику России с использованием моделей комплексной оценки (IAM) // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2025b. № 1. С. 49–61. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700724700503

Степанов И.А., Агикян Н.Д., Музыченко Е.Э. От чего зависит амбициозность климатической политики разных стран // Вестник международных организаций. 2021. Т. 16. № 4. С. 57–79. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2021-04-03

Dubash N.K., Mitchell C., Boasson E.L., Borbor-Cordova M.J., Fifita S., Haites E., Jaccard M., Jotzo F., Naidoo S., Romero-Lankao P., Shlapak M., Shen W., Wu L. National and Sub-National Policies and Institutions // Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / ed. by P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade et al. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157926.015

Gifford R., Nilsson A. Personal and Social Factors That Influence Pro-Environmental Concern and Behaviour: A Review // International Journal of Psychology. 2014. Vol. 49. Is. 3. P. 141–157. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12034

Lamb W., Minx J. The Political Economy of National Climate Policy: Architectures of Constraint and a Typology of Countries // Energy Research & Social Science. 2020. Vol. 64. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101429

Lenton T.M., Xu C., Abrams J.F., Ghadiali A., Loriani S., Sakschewski B., Zimm C., Ebi K.L., Dunn R.R., Svenning J-Ch., Scheffer M. Quantifying the Human Cost of Global Warming // Nat Sustain. 2023. Vol. 6. P. 1237–1247. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01132-6

Patt A., Rajamani L., Bhandari P., Ivanova Boncheva A., Caparrós A., Djemouai K., Kubota I., Peel J., Sari A.P., Sprinz D.F., Wettestad J. International Cooperation // Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / ed. by P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade et al. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157926.016

Romanovskaya A.A., Federici S. How Much Greenhouse Gas Can Each Global Inhabitant Emit While Attaining the Paris Agreement Temperature Limit Goal? The Equity Dilemma in Sharing the Global Climate Budget to 2100 // Carbon Management. 2019. Vol. 10. P. 361–377. DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2019.1620037

Summary for Policymakers // Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / ed. by P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade et al. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2022. DOI: 10.1017/9781009157926.001

Downloads

Published

2025-10-28

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1-10 of 222

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.