Государственное управление. Электронный вестник

Entrepreneurial Model vs Humboldt University Model: Institutionalization of University Entrepreneurship. Methodology and Practice of Solutions

Authors

  • Guzel I. Gumerova

    Автор
  • Elmira Sh. Shaimieva

    Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2070-1381-115-2026-159-173

Keywords:

Entrepreneurial model, Humboldt model, social entrepreneurship, technological entrepreneurship, institutional foundations.

Abstract

University technological and social entrepreneurship based on the university ecosystems of the BRICS countries, the University Technological Entrepreneurship Platform is an integral part of knowledge transfer. Successful practices in addressing the institutionalization of university entrepreneurship on a global scale form the basis of high-achieving economies in the Global Innovation Ranking (China’s experience). The aim of the article is to institutionalize university entrepreneurship in the Russian educational space by solving the following problems: revealing the essence of entrepreneurial and Humboldt models of universities; analyzing the development of the university’s entrepreneurial model based on current standards in the Russian educational space. Methods include general scientific methods. Research information base consists of the works indexed in the Scientific Electronic Library (elibrary), Google Scholar. As a result, the processes of institutionalization of university entrepreneurship in the broadest sense of the word are considered, including the processes of accounting for university startups from the relevant statistical collections, bringing standards to a status that allows them to create products that are accepted from the pilot stage, pilot batch in Russian and foreign markets, including the BRICS, MENA, LATAM markets; the concept of “university social entrepreneurship” based on the Federal Law “On Education in the Russian Federation” is clarified as a concept reflecting, on the one hand, the current understanding of education, on the other hand, based on university project activities; standards in the field of university entrepreneurship, with the allocation of universal, specialized standards are systemized; Humboldt’s entrepreneurial university models are differentiated based on R. Rothwell ’s classification from the stage of the origin of ideas for innovative projects with the creation of products and/or solutions for socio-economic problems of the region (the first stage) to the stage of obtaining results (the third stage) through the organization of the innovation and project process at the university (the second stage); recommendations on the system of static monitoring of university technological and social entrepreneurship are formed. The results obtained can be used to promote university technology and social entrepreneurship in the markets of the BRICS, MENA, and LATAM countries.

Author Biographies

  • Guzel I. Gumerova

    DSc (Economics), Professor
    ORCID: 0000-0002-5198-7576
    GIGumerova@fa.ru

    Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation

  • Elmira Sh. Shaimieva

    DSc (Economics)
    ORCID: 0000-0002-9588-0199
    shaimieva@ieml.ru

    Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (IEML), Kazan, Russian Federation

References

Абрамов Р.Н. Инженерный труд в позднесоветский период: рутина, творчество, проектная дисциплина // Социология власти. 2020. Т. 32. № 1. С. 179–214. DOI: 10.22394/2074-0492-2020-1-179-214

Байнова М.С., Зворыгин Р.В. Государственная поддержка социально ориентированных НКО в России в условиях глобальных вызовов: виды, эффективность, направления совершенствования // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2025. № 110. С. 7–20. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2070-1381-110-2025-7-20

Гумерова Г.И., Шаймиева Э.Ш. Система управления данными для стандартов бережливого управления в вузах // Стандарты и качество. 2025a. № 5. С. 100–104. DOI: 10.35400/0038-9692-2025-5-51-25

Гумерова Г.И., Шаймиева Э.Ш. Модели искусственного интеллекта для стандартов университетского технологического предпринимательства // Стандарты и качество. 2025b. № 11. С. 100-103. DOI: 10.35400/0038-9692-2025-11-116-25

Гумерова Г.И., Шаймиева Э.Ш. Предпринимательская vs гумбольдтовская модель вуза: институционализация университетского предпринимательства. Методология процесса» // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2026. № 114. С. 192–206. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2070-1381-114-2026-192-206

Корчагин Р.Л. Развитие академического технологического предпринимательства в России // Вестник Кемеровского государственного университета. Серия: Политические, социологические и экономические науки. 2021. Т. 6. № 3(21). С. 390–400. DOI: 10.21603/2500-3372-2021-6-3-390-400

Кряклина Т.Ф., Реттих С.В. Теория и практика трансфера знаний «Университета 3.0» // Язык и культура. 2019. № 48. С. 154–165. DOI: 10.17223/19996195/48/10

Осипова О.С. Эволюция студенческого инновационного предпринимательства в России // Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2023. Т. 16. № 5. С. 6–15. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2023-16-5-6-15

Симдянкин А.А. Трактование понятия «кластер» применительно к туристической отрасли // Вестник Белгородского университета кооперации, экономики и права. 2025. № 1(110). С. 79–91. DOI: 10.21295/2223-5639-2025-1-79-91

Тюрчев К.С., Милова К.Е. Что нужно стартапу? Региональные факторы развития малого технологического бизнеса в России // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2024. № 105. С. 207–231. DOI: 10.55959/MSU2070-1381-105-2024-207-231

Шуванов И.Б., Шуванова В.П., Круглова М.С., Круглова Л.Э. Исследование готовности обучающихся к разработке выпускной квалификационной работы в виде стартапа // Гуманизация образования. 2022. № 4. С. 22–34. DOI: 10.24412/1029-3388-2022-4-22-34

Щербакова Е.С., Шинкевич А.И. Тенденции успешности стартапов с технологиями искусственного интеллекта при стимулировании инноваций в рамках «шестиспиральной» модели // Управление устойчивым развитием. 2025. № 2(57). С. 12–24. DOI: 10.55421/2499992X_2025_2_12

Al-Maadeed S.A., Al-Kwifi O.S. Transformation to an Entrepreneurial University: The Case of Qatar University // Journal of Asia Business Studies. 2025. DOI: 10.1108/JABS-08-2024-0471

Bimbo O. The Politics of Higher Education in the BRICS Countries: A Critical Investigation of the Developments, Policies and Perspectives // Journal of Public Administration and Social Welfare Research. 2024. Vol. 9. Is. 4. P. 212–243. DOI: 10.56201/jpaswr.v9.no4.2024.pg212.243

de bem Machado A., Pesqueira A., Santos J.R., Sacavém A., Sousa M.J., Teixeira F.J.C.e.N. ESG and Digital Transformation in Organizations // Environmental, Social, Governance and Digital Transformation in Organizations. Information Systems Engineering and Management / ed. by A.d.b. Machado, M.J. Sousa, A. Brambilla, A. Pesqueira, A. Rocha. Cham: Springer, 2025. Vol. 35. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-86079-9_1

de Moraes M.A., de Moraes G.H.S., do Prado N.B., Fischer B.B. Triggering Sustainable Transitions in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: Key Enabling Conditions and Outcomes // Sustainable Development. 2025. Vol. 33. Is. S1. P. 275–295. DOI: 10.1002/sd.70005

Duval-Couetil N., Ladisch M., Yi S. Addressing Academic Researcher Priorities through Science and Technology Entrepreneurship Education // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2021. Vol. 46. P. 288–318. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-020-09787-5

Faïza M.B., Ibtissem B., Lounis K. Entrepreneurial Incubation within the Enterpreneurial University: The Case of Incubators at the Kolea University Pole // La Revue des Sciences Commerciales. 2025. Vol. 24. Num. 1. P. 6–27.

Liu J., Fang Y., Ma Y. The Driving Impact of Digital Innovation Ecosystems on Enterprise Digital Transformation: Based on an Interpretable Machine Learning Model // Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 17. Is. 13. DOI: 10.3390/su17135898

Pinto H. Universities and Institutionalization of Regional Innovation Policy in Peripheral Regions: Insights from the Smart Specialization in Portugal // Regional Science Policy & Practice. 2024. Vol. 16. Is. 1.DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12659

Rizwan A., Naveed Sh., Mustafa F., Hanif M., Khurshid A., Zubair T. Khan A. Prospects for Institutionalization of Crowdfunding: A Developing Country Perspective // Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. 2024. Vol. 13. Is. 4. P. 566–598. DOI: 10.1108/JEPP-09-2023-0086

Rothwell R. Towards the Fifth-Generation Innovation Process // International Marketing Review. 1994. Vol. 11. Is. 1. Р. 7–31. DOI: 10.1108/02651339410057491

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1-10 of 297

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.