Reflection of Environmental Policy of Moscow Government and Moscow Region in Media News Context

Reflection of Environmental Policy of Moscow Government and Moscow Region in Media News Context

Authors

  • Marina V. Rybakova
  • Maria M. Zvereva

Keywords:

Environmental situation, environmental policy, Government, Moscow, Moscow region, mass media.

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the environmental policy of the Government of Moscow and the Moscow region and its reflection in the news content of the mass media for the period from January 01 to July 31, 2023. The analysis of publications was carried out using the automated system Medialogy. The total number of analyzed publications is 6620 messages. The results of the study indicate that the gap associated with the population’s need for a favorable environmental situation and the real state of affairs tends to decrease. Publications have a pronounced positive emotional coloring. At the same time, the problems that, according to environmental monitoring by All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center, do not lose their relevance, namely, the response of the authorities to environmental problems, construction and transport issues, are reflected in publications in the media and make up a set of the most complete thematic headings. The information field in the sphere of ecology is sensitive to regulatory events: a surge of publications occurs in the period of active transformations in environmental legislation, which suggests that such a management tool as regulatory regulation has the greatest weight in the information space. An important role in shaping a positive perception of the environmental situation is given to dialogues with government officials (for example, the mayor of Moscow), as well as various environmental actions that allow government officials and environmental activists to carry out targeted activities and broadcast their benefits to the population. As prospects for further research, the opportunity to analyze the publications of various persons, groups and channels in social networks is highlighted.

Author Biographies

Marina V. Rybakova

DSc (Sociology), Principal Researcher, FCTAS RAS, Professor of Sociology
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation
ORCID: 0000-0002-7610-3896
rybakovamv2005@yandex.ru

Maria M. Zvereva

Postgraduate student
FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation
maria.yazynina@gmail.com

References

Берджесс Э.У. Рост города: введение в исследовательский проект // Чикагская школа социологии: сборник переводов / сост. и пер. Николаев В.Г.; отв. ред. Ефременко Д.В. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2015. С. 20–34.

Блумер Г. Символический интеракционизм. М.: Элементарные формы, 2019.

Добрынина Я.С. Экологическая проблематика в медиапространстве г. Челябинск // Социодинамика. 2022. № 1. С. 18–35. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2022.1.37409

Зверева М.М. Социальные экологические практики жителей города в рамках структурного конструктивизма и культурного антропологизма // Власть. 2023. Т. 31. № 3. С. 208–213. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v31i3.9659

Лободенко Л.К., Перевозова О.В., Череднякова А.Б., Харитонова О.Ю. Анализ представленности экологической проблематики в социальных сетях региональных интернет-СМИ // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Литературоведение, журналистика. 2022. Т. 27. № 3. С. 600–614. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9220-2022-27-3-600-614

Маклюэн М. Понимание медиа. Внешние расширения человека. М.: Кучково поле, 2023.

Порфирьева И.Д. Специфика освещения региональной экологической политики на примере Республики Татарстан // Политическая лингвистика. 2020. № 1(79). С. 58–61. DOI: 10.26170/pl20-01-07

Расторгуев С.В., Тян Ю.С. Протестный экоактивизм в цифровой среде (на примере «Красноярского кейса») // Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2021. № 6. С. 53–75. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2017

Рыбакова М.В., Зверева М.М. Экологическая обстановка в Москве: оценка динамики общественного мнения по результатам опросов 2013–2022 гг. // Власть. 2022. Т. 30. № 5. С. 156–162. DOI: 10.31171/vlast.v30i5.9256

Хабермас Ю. Теория коммуникативной деятельности. М.: Весь мир, 2022.

Bullard R.D. Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. Boston: South End Press, 1993.

Decker E., Elliott S., Smith F. Megacities and the Environment // The Scientific World Journal. 2002. Vol. 2. P. 374–386. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2002.103

Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.

Landry C. The Creative City: A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London, Sterling VA: Earthscan, 2012.

Milbrath L.W. Environmentalists: Vanguard for a New Society. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1984.

Milbrath L.W. Redefining the Good Life in a Sustainable Society // Environmental Values. 1993. Vol. 2. Is. 3. P. 261–269. DOI: 10.3197/096327193776679891

Ong W.J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge, 2002.

Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 2003.

The Rise of Megacities: Challenges, Opportunities and Unique Characteristics / ed. by J. Kleer, K.A. Nawrot. London: World Scientific Publishing Europe Limited, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Reflection of Environmental Policy of Moscow Government and Moscow Region in Media News Context. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 102, 207-221. https://doi.org/10.24412/1q22mj22

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Reflection of Environmental Policy of Moscow Government and Moscow Region in Media News Context. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 102, 207-221. https://doi.org/10.24412/1q22mj22

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 289

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...