Strategic Management Specifics of High Technology Companies Operating on Increasing-Returns Markets

Strategic Management Specifics of High Technology Companies Operating on Increasing-Returns Markets

Authors

Keywords:

Hi-tech company, knowledge management, strategic management, increasing returns concept, path dependence, market lock-in, technology lock-out

Abstract

Based on knowledge, the hi-tech companies are subject to the economic law of increasing returns. The aim of this research is to reveal the specifics of management of hi-tech companies that operate on the increasing-returns markets. The article analyzes the evolution of the theoretical thought on the phenomenon of increasing returns starting from the end of the 19th century till the beginning of the 21 st century. The theoretical framework of the research is constituted by the work of the leading economic and management scientists such as A. Marshall, A. Young, N. Kaldor, K. Arrow, M. Spence, J. Stiglitz, and many others. A special attention is paid to the research of succession of the increasing returns concept by reviewing the publications of the researchers who have made the most important contribution to this field. The evolution of views on the increasing returns concept in both economics and management science is traced. It is shown how the popularity of increasing returns concept in academic circles has led to the spread of the get-big-fast strategies in management practice, in order to achieve the effect of market lock-in on the prevailing product or technology. Moreover, a comparative study of traditional and increasing returns industries is provided. The paper gives recommendations to the managers of high-tech companies in strategy development. The recommendation can also be useful to the leaders of digital technology platforms, the growth of which also depends on the law of increasing returns, often manifested through economies of scale, network externalities and the experience curve.

Author Biography

Dmitry Yu. Katalevsky, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Institute of Business Studies, RANEPA

PhD, DSc applicant, Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Associate Professor, High School of Business, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Associate Professor, Institute of Business Studies, RANEPA, Moscow, Russian Federation.

dkatalevsky@yahoo.com

References

Акаев А.А. Модели инновационного эндогенного экономического роста AN-типа и их обоснование // МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие). 2015. Т. 6. № 2-1(22). С. 70–79. DOI: 10.18184/2079-4665.2015.6.2.70.79

Артур Б. Возрастающая отдача и два мира бизнеса // Terra Economicus. 2005. Т. 3 № 4. С. 7–19.

Барнев А.Ю. Инновация как экономическая категория // Инновации. 2007. № 9. С. 61–63.

Виханский О.С., Наумов А.И. Другой менеджмент: время перемен // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2004. № 3. С. 105–126.

Делепляс Г. Лекции по истории экономической мысли. Новосибирск: НГУ, 2000.

Исаев А.Г. Возрастающая отдача от масштаба и экономический рост российских регионов: эмпирическая проверка закона Вердоорна // Регионалистика. 2020. Т. 7. № 6. С. 39–48. DOI: 10.14530/reg.2020.6.39

Каталевский Д.Ю. Управление ростом организации на основе системно-динамического подхода // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 21. Управление (государство и общество). 2007. № 4. С. 64–80.

Петрунин Ю.Ю. Искусственный интеллект и методологические вопросы управления знаниями // Философские науки. 2016. № 8. С. 67–74.

Сенге П. Искусство и практика построения самообучающейся организации. М.: Олимп-Бизнес, 2003.

Современные агротехнологии: экономико-правовые и регуляторные аспекты / под ред. Д.Ю. Каталевского, А.Ю. Иванова. М.: Издательский дом НИУ ВШЭ, 2019.

Тис Д.Д., Пизано Г., Шуэн Э. Динамические способности фирмы и стратегическое управление // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Серия «Менеджмент». 2003. № 4. С. 133–183.

Шумпетер Й. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М.: Эксмо, 2007.

Arrow K.J. Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions // The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity / ed. by R.R. Nelson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and NBER, 1962b. P. 609–626.

Arrow K.J. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing // Review of Economic Studies. 1962a. Vol. 29. Is. 3. P. 155–173. DOI: 10.2307/2295952

Arthur W.B. Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events // The Economic Journal. 1989. Vol. 99. Is. 394. P. 116–131.DOI: 10.2307/2234208

Arthur W.B. On Competing Technologies and Historical Small Events: The Dynamics of Choice under Increasing Returns // IIASA Working Paper. 1983. WP-83–090. URL: https://sites.santafe.edu/~wbarthur/Papers/Arthur%20IIASA%201983%20paper.pdf

Arthur W.B. Positive Feedbacks in the Economy // Scientific American. 1990. Vol. 262. Is. 2. P. 92–99.

Arthur W.B. Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics // The Economy as an Evolving Complex System / ed. by Ph.W. Anderson, K. Arrow, D. Pines. Redwood City, Calif.: Addison-Wesley, 1988. P. 9–31.

Becker W.E. Review: Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy by Carl Shapiro and Hal R. Varian. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 1999.

Brown S., Eisenhardt K. Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions // Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20. Is. 2. P. 343–378. DOI: 10.2307/258850

Burgelman R. Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research // Organization Science. 1991. Vol. 2. Is. 3. P. 239–262.

Chamberlin E.H. Theory of Monopolistic Competition: A Re-Orientation of the Theory of Value. London: Oxford University Press, 1949.

Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation // Administrative Science Quarterly. 1990. Vol. 35. Is. 1 (Special issue). P. 128–152. DOI: 10.2307/2393553

Cowan R. Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study in Technological Lock-in // The Journal of Economic History. 1990. Vol.50. Is. 3. P. 541–567.

Damanpour F. Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators // Academy of Management Journal. 1991. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 555–590. DOI: 10.2307/256406

David P.A. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY // The American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75. Is. 2. P. 332–337.

Dixit A., Stiglitz J.E. Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity // American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67. Is. 3. P. 297–308.

Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Platform Envelopment // Strategic Management Journal. 2011. Vol. 32. Is. 12. P. 1270–1285. DOI: 10.1002/smj.935

Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed Base and Compatibility: Innovation, Product Preannouncements, and Predation // The American Economic Review. 1986. Vol. 76. Is. 5. P. 940–955.

Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation // The RAND Journal of Economics. 1985. Vol. 16. Is. 1. P. 70–83.

Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Upgrades, Tradeins, and Buybacks // The RAND Journal of Economics. 1998. Vol. 29. Is. 2. P. 235–258.

Gangotena S.J., Safner R. The Production of Increasing Returns: Physical Technology, Institutional Technology, and the Pitfalls of Production Functions // SSRN. 2016. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2626587

Gold A.H., Malhotra A., Segars A.H. Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective // Journal of Management Information Systems. 2001. Vol. 18. Is. 1. P. 185–214. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045669

Goldfarb B., Kirsch D., Miller D.A. Was There Too Little Entry During the Dot Com Era? // Journal of Financial Economics. 2007. Vol. 86. Is. 1. P. 100–144.

Grant R.M. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm // Strategic Management Journal. 1996. Vol. 17. Is. S2. P. 109–122. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250171110

Harris R.G. The Knowledge-Based Economy: Intellectual Origins and New Economic Perspectives // International Journal of Management Reviews. 2001. Vol. 3. Is. 1. P. 21–40. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2370.00052

Hicks J.R. Distribution and Economic Progress: A Revised Version // The Review of Economic Studies. 1936. Vol. 4. Is. 1. P. 1–12. DOI: 10.2307/2967656

Hirsch W.Z. Firm Progress Ratios // Econometrica. 1956. Vol. 24. Is. 2. P. 136–143.

Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a Theory of Ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018. Vol. 39. Is. 8. P. 2255–2276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904

Kaldor N. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom: An Inaugural Lecture. London: Cambridge University Press, 1966.

Katz M.L., Shapiro C. Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities // Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94. Is. 4. P. 822–841.

Knight F.H. Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1924. Vol. 38. Is. 4. P. 582–606.

Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology // Organization Science. 1992. Vol. 3. Is. 3. P. 301–441. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.3.3.383

Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography // Journal of Political Economy. 1991. Vol. 99. Is. 3. P. 483–499.

Krugman P.R. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade // Journal of International Economics. 1979. Vol. 9. Is. 4. P. 469–479. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5

Krugman P. Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade // The American Economic Review. 1980. Vol. 70. Is. 5. P. 950–959.

Krugman P. What’s New about the New Economic Geography? // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 1998. Vol. 14. Is. 2. P. 7–17.

Liebowitz S.J., Margolis S.E. Network Externality: An Uncommon Tragedy // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1994. Vol. 8. Is. 2. P. 133–150.

Liebowitz S.J., Margolis S.E. The Fable of the Keys // The Journal of Law and Economics. 1990. Vol. 33. Is. 1. P. 1–25.

Mansfield E. How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out? // The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1985. P. 217–223. DOI: 10.2307/2098683

Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1982.

Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oхford: Oхford University Press, 1995.

Oliva R., Sterman J.D., Giese M. Limits to Growth in the New Economy: Exploring the “Get Big Fast” Strategy in E-Commerce // System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society. 2003. Vol. 19. Is. 2. P. 83–117. DOI: 10.1002/sdr.271

Penrose E., Penrose E.T. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: Wiley, 1959.

Robertson D.H., Sraffa P., Shove G.F. Increasing Returns and the Representative Firm // The Economic Journal. 1930. Vol. 40. Is. 157. P. 79–116. DOI: 10.2307/2223643

Romer P.M. Endogenous Technological Change // Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98. Is. 5. Part 2. P. S71–S102.

Romer P.M. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth // Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94. Is. 5. P. 1002–1037.

Schilling M.A. Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities // Academy of Management Journal. 2002. Vol. 45. Is. 2. P. 387–398. DOI: 10.5465/3069353

Shapiro C., Varian H.R. The Art of Standards Wars // California Management Review. 1999. Vol. 41. Is. 2. P. 8–32. DOI: 10.2307/411659

Solow R.M. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1957. Vol. 39. Is. 3 P. 312–320. DOI: 10.2307/1926047

Spector R. Amazon.com: Get Big Fast: Inside the Revolutionary Business Model That Changed the World. New York: Harper Business, 2000.

Spence M. Product Selection, Fixed Costs and Monopolistic Competition // Review of Economic Studies. 1976. Vol. 43. Is. 2. P. 217–235. DOI: 10.2307/2297319

Sterman J.D., Henderson R., Beinhocker E.D., Newman L.I. Getting Big Too Fast: Strategic Dynamics with Increasing Returns and Bounded Rationality // Management Science. 2007. Vol. 53. Is. 4. P. 683–696.

The Oxford Handbook of Innovation / ed. by J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2005.

Weitzman M.L. Recombinant Growth // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1998. Vol. 113. Is. 2. P. 331–360.

Williams J.R. How Sustainable Is Your Competitive Advantage? // California Management Review. 1992. Vol. 34. Is. 3. P. 29–51. DOI: 10.2307/41167422

Young A.A. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress // The Economic Journal. 1928. Vol. 38. Is. 152. P. 527–542. DOI: 10.2307/2224097

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Strategic Management Specifics of High Technology Companies Operating on Increasing-Returns Markets. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 94, 84-107. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/137

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Strategic Management Specifics of High Technology Companies Operating on Increasing-Returns Markets. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 94, 84-107. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/137

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 221

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...