Civilization in the Face of Sociology

Civilization in the Face of Sociology

Authors

  • Valery V. Fedorov

Keywords:

Enlightenment, Marxism, world-system, civilizational turn in sociology, civilizational approach, cultural and value core, Russian civilization.

Abstract

The article is a brief overview of the concepts that exist in sociological science from the moment of its inception to the present and related to civilizational issues. The peculiarities of this branch of knowledge, which arose during the Great Industrial Revolution, in the era of the formation of nation-states, led to the fact that for a long time sociologists did not use a civilizational approach, the idea of civilization prevailed as a certain stage in the development of society, opposing “barbarism”, in the age of Enlightenment (F. Guizot), and in the twentieth century (N. Elias). At the same time, it is possible to identify a certain attitude to civilizational issues in Marxism, and in an alternative approach to it, which the author calls technological (D. Bell, O. Tofler with J. Gelbraith adjacent to them), and in the concept of the “world-system” by I. Wallerstein, and in geoeconomics by F. Braudel. The article analyzes the contribution to the sociology of civilizations of the classics of the civilizational approach (N.Y. Danilevsky, O. Spengler, A. Toynbee, P. Sorokin). Special attention is paid to the “civilizational turn” in sociology in the 1970s, primarily related to the works of Sh. Eisenstadt and continued at the beginning of the XXI century by Aronson, as well as the concept of Russian civilization in the works of sociologists D. Nielsen and I. Yakovenko. The article raises theoretical questions about the civilizational approach from a sociological perspective, first of all, the scientific possibilities to identify specifically cultural and value cores of various civilizations, including Russian, to define Russian civilization in relation to the concepts of Eastern Christian civilization and Soviet civilization, as well as the degree of its universalism and autarkism.

Author Biography

Valery V. Fedorov

PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of the All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion at the Higher School of Economics, General Director of VСIOM
ORCID: 0000-0001-6407-543Х
web@wciom.com

HSE University; VCIOM (Russian Public Opinion Research Center), Moscow, Russian Federation

References

Арнасон Й. Цивилизационные паттерны и исторические процессы. М.: НЛО, 2021.

Белл Д. Грядущее постиндустриальное общество. М.: Академия, 1999.

Бродель Ф. Материальная цивилизация, экономика и капитализм, XV–XVIII вв. В 3 томах. М.: Альма-Матер, 2023.

Валлерстайн И. Существует ли в действительности Индия // Логос. 2006. № 5(56). С. 3–8.

Валлерстайн И. Исторический капитализм. Капиталистическая цивилизация. М.: КМК, 2008.

Гизо Ф. История цивилизации во Франции. Т. 1. М.: Издательский дом «Рубежи XXI», 2006.

Гэлбрейт Дж., Меньшиков С. Капитализм, социализм, сосуществование. М.: Прогресс, 1988.

Данилевский Н.Я. Россия и Европа. М.: ОГИЗ, 2000.

Маркс К.К критике политической экономии. Предисловие // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. М.: Политиздат, 1959. Т. 13. С. 1–167.

Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Немецкая идеология // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. М.: Политиздат, 1955. Т. 3. С. 7–544.

Окара А. В окрестностях нового Константинополя, или восточнохристианская цивилизация перед лицом новейшего мирового хаосо-порядка // Цивилизационные активы и цивилизационные рамки национальной российской политики. Материалы научного семинара. М.: Научный эксперт, 2008. № 6(15). С. 9–52.

Сорокин П.А. Социальная и культурная динамика. М.: Астрель, 2006.

Тойнби А.Дж. Постижение истории. М.: Прогресс, 1991.

Тоффлер Э. Третья волна. М.: АСТ, 2010.

Шпенглер О. Закат Европы. Очерки морфологии мировой истории. В 2 томах. М.: Академический проект, 2022.

Элиас Н. О процессе цивилизации. В 2 томах. М.: Университетская книга, 2001.

Энгельс Ф. Происхождение семьи, частной собственности и государства. М.: АСТ, 2019.

Яковенко И., Музыкантский А. Манихейство и гностицизм: культурные коды русской цивилизации. М.: МЦНМО, 2020.

Durkheim E., Mauss M. Note on the Notion of Civilization // Social Research. 1971. Vol. 38. Is. 4. P. 808–813.

Eisenstadt S.N. Jewish Civilization: The Jewish Historical Experience in a Comparative Perspective. New York: State University of New York, 1993.

Eisenstadt S.N. Modernity and the Construction of Collective Identities // International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 1998. Vol. 39. Is. 1. URL: https://brill.com/view/journals/ijcs/39/3/article-p138_9.xml

Eisenstadt S.N. Civilizational Dimension of Modernity. Modernity as a Distinct Civilization // International Sociology. 2001. Vol. 16. Is. 3. P. 320–340. DOI: 10.1177/02685800101600300

Eisenstadt S.N. Comparative Civilizations and Multiple Modernities. Leiden: Briel Academic Publishers, 2003.

Nielsen D.A. Sects, Churches and Economic Transformations in Russia and Western Europe // International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 1989. Vol. 2. Is. 4. P. 493−499.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-12

How to Cite

Civilization in the Face of Sociology. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 104(S), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.24412/ck3nh873

How to Cite

Civilization in the Face of Sociology. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 104(S), 113-122. https://doi.org/10.24412/ck3nh873

Similar Articles

1-10 of 335

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...