Customer-Centricity as a Vector of Trust Economy

Customer-Centricity as a Vector of Trust Economy

Authors

  • Dmitriy P. Arkalov

Keywords:

Customer-centricity, trust economy, satisfaction, power distance, public institutions, social capital, “prisoner’s dilemma”.

Abstract

At present, quite a lot of research has been conducted in the field of trust economy by both well-known economists and sociologists and political scientists. And everyone emphasizes the importance of this socio-economic phenomenon for improving people’s lives, forming a sustainable society and the economy of countries. The work is devoted to the study of the trust economy as an environment that promotes the growth of economic benefits and the role of the client-centric approach within the framework of the “State for People” concept. The methodological basis of the study were the theoretical provisions of institutional economics, applied research in the field of game theory (using the example of the “prisoner’s dilemma” game) and behavioral economics, as well as practical examples and business solutions. The study considers aspects of the trust economy from the point of view of the importance of forming social capital. Models of various aspects of the trust economy are presented as fragments of the system of socio-economic relations. The model of the internal dynamics of the client-centric approach shows that the implementation of the approach itself and its formal consolidation in corporate activities is important, but not sufficient for forming a trust environment. No less important is the restructuring of mental models of all participants in economic relations. The importance of the information environment and the corresponding feedback between all actors is shown. It is described that information is also an economic good that is subject to formation, exchange and accumulation. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that in the center of economic relations for the formation of economic goods, and in particular, in the relationships “person — state”, “citizen — state” is the person himself as an individual with certain mental models. The definition of the economy of trust as a synthetic added value (environment) to the relationship of economic agents, a citizen and the state, business and the state is proposed. The role and importance of social capital as a system of relationships in the creation and exchange of economic goods is noted. Client-centricity is defined as an information vector that has a specific direction and certain objective and subjective limitations.

Author Biography

Dmitriy P. Arkalov

PhD, Deputy Minister for Physical Culture and Sports of the Udmurt Republic
ORCID: 0000-0002-2751-9836
lao48@yandex.ru

Ministry for Physical Culture and Sports of the Udmurt Republic, Izhevsk, Russian Federation

References

Аузан А.А. Человеческий капитал как драйвер развития глобально конкурентоспособных направлений // Научные труды Вольного экономического общества России. 2022. Т. 235. № 3. С. 79–84. DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-235-3-79-84

Балыкина Г.А. Дистанция власти и современные коммуникативные практики управления // Социокультурные проблемы языка и коммуникации. Саратов: Поволжский институт управления имени П.А. Столыпина — филиал ФГБОУ ВПО «Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации», 2015. С. 26–31.

Дрогобыцкий И.Н. Ментальные модели в экономике // Экономическая наука современной России. 2019. № 1(84). С. 7–15.

Дрогобыцкий И.Н. Системизация национального образования // Системный анализ в проектировании и управлении: Сборник научных трудов XXVI Международной научно-практической конференции. В 3 ч. Санкт-Петербург: Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Санкт-Петербургский политехнический университет Петра Великого», 2023. Ч. 3. С. 234–242. DOI: 10.18720/SPBPU/2/id23-481

Ермилова А.В. Влияние социального капитала на продолжительность периода профессиональной деятельности спортсменов высших достижений // Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. 2022. № 4(64). С. 5–18. DOI: 10.21685/2072-3016-2022-4-1

Косьмин А.Д., Кузнецова А.П., Косьмина Е.А. Общественное доверие как фактор цивилизованного развития общества // Креативная экономика. 2018. Т. 12, № 6. С. 733–746. DOI: 10.18334/ce.12.6.39194

Лукашевич Е.В. «Больше невозможно держать дистанцию»: эффективность коммуникативных практик органов государственной власти // Экология языка и коммуникативная практика. 2014. № 1(2). С. 128–142.

Масюк М.М., Бушуева М.А., Васюкова Л.К., Кирьянов А.Е. Платформы цифрового опыта и цифровой трансформации в инновационной экономике // Resonances Science: Proceedings of articles the III International scientific conference. Краснодар: Международный центр научно-исследовательских проектов, 2018. С. 253–262.

Перевощиков Ю.С. Экономическая метрология. Поиск меры справедливости. Часть I. Философия будничной жизни. М., Ижевск: ИПК «Издательство стандартов»; «Персей», 1996.

Салихов А.В. Психологическое доверие как основа экономического доверия // Балтийский экономический журнал. 2011. № 2(6). С. 156–164.

Фукуяма Ф. Доверие. Социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. М.: АСТ, 2006.

Чернавский Д.С. Синергетика и информация. Динамическая теория информации. М.: Наука, 2001.

Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers, 2012.

Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books, 1984.

Bourdieu P. «The Forms of Capital» // Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / ed. by J.G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986. P. 241–258.

Castaldo S., Premazzi K., Zerbini F. The Meaning(s) of Trust. A Content Analysis on the Diverse Conceptualizations of Trust in Scholarly Research on Business Relationships // Journal of Business Ethics. 2010. Vol. 96. P. 657–668. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0491-4

Hand D.J. Dark Data: Why What You Don’t Know Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.

Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.

Pelgander L., Öberg Ch., Barkenäs L. Trust and the Sharing Economy // Digital Business. 2022. Vol. 2. Is. 2. DOI: 10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100048

Putnam R. Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences // Canadian Journal of Policy Research. 2010. Vol. 2. P. 41–51.

Sutherland R. Alchemy. The Dark Art and Curious Science of Creating Magic in Brands, Business, and Life. New York: Mariner Books, 2019.

Thaler R. Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics. New York: WW Norton & Company, 2015.

Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty // Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1992. Vol. 5. P. 297–323. DOI: 10.1007/BF00122574

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Customer-Centricity as a Vector of Trust Economy. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 106, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.24412/1n95gg49

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Customer-Centricity as a Vector of Trust Economy. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 106, 116-126. https://doi.org/10.24412/1n95gg49

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Similar Articles

41-50 of 312

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...