Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Experience of Project Management in the E-Government Concept Implementation

Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Experience of Project Management in the E-Government Concept Implementation

Authors

  • Grigory A. Kulkaev Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
  • Natalia I. Mozaleva JSC “Laser Systems”
  • Dmitry N. Leontiev Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4457-735X

Keywords:

E-government, project management, benchmarking, public administration, social effect

Abstract

Public administration, like any other process, is undergoing a number of changes today in conditions when the external management environment is becoming more volatile. In such conditions, the subject of management needs to show a high degree of flexibility, sensitivity and ability to adjust and stabilize the situation. Public administration, as a process characterized by a high level of bureaucratization, centralization of power and strict hierarchy, is extremely difficult to maneuver and adapt methods, tools, as well as goals and objectives in such conditions. However, today it is possible to observe the actualization of such a type of management as project management, not only in the commercial industry, but also within the framework of state functions implementation. This article raises the issue of the effectiveness of project management in the framework of digitalization of public administration in Russia and foreign countries. In the course of the analysis of domestic and foreign experience, a comparison of project documentation, implementation results, as well as features of project execution is carried out. The article analyzes the effectiveness of government spending on digitalization of public power. This analysis made it possible to evaluate the financial activity of each state under study in comparison with the resulting social effect. This research allowed us to single out in one category the successful experience of implementing the concept of e-government, including competent planning of activities, correct prioritization of implementation and implementation of rational measures of state support; in another category we can single out the unsuccessful experience of both Russia and other countries in the functioning of e-government. In conclusion, the article presents recommendations formed based on the analysis done and the method of benchmarking, which will contribute to increasing the pace of development of the digital state environment in Russia.

Author Biographies

Grigory A. Kulkaev, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

Master’s degree student, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation. 

kulkaev_g@spbstu.ru

 

Natalia I. Mozaleva, JSC “Laser Systems”

Specialist, JSC “Laser Systems”, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.

natamozaleva@mail.ru

 

Dmitry N. Leontiev, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

PhD, Associate Professor, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.

alain2000@mail.ru

References

Акаткин Ю.М. Ясиновская Е.Д. Цифровая трансформация государственного управления. Датацентричность и семантическая интероперабельность. М.: ДПК Пресс, 2018.

Белов В.Б. Новое правительство ФРГ и германо-российские отношения. Часть 1 // Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. 2022. № 1 (25). С. 67–78. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran120226778

Васславский Я.И., Габуев С.В. Варианты развития электронного правительства. опыт России, США, КНР // Международные процессы. 2017. Т. 15. № 1 (48). С. 108–125. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2017.15.1.48.9

Груднов Д.В. Электронные партисипативные технологии в осуществлении современного публичного управления и деятельности электронного правительства // Вестник МГЭИ (On Line). 2020. № 2. С. 301–313. DOI: 10.37691/2619-0265-2020-0-2-301-313

Давиденко А.С. Концепция электронного правительства и цифровизация политической системы // Территория новых возможностей. Вестник Владивостокского государственного университета экономики и сервиса. 2020. № 4. С. 30–38. DOI: 10.24866/VVSU/2073-3984/2020-4/030-038

Дрожжинов В.И., Куприяновский В.П., Евтушенко С.Н., Намиот Д.Е. Стратегический подход к формированию цифрового правительства США // International Journal Of Open Information Technologies. 2017. Т. 5. № 4. С. 29–54.

Солодовник А.И., Яковлев Н.А. Концепция е-government (электронное правительство) в информационном обществе и цифровой экономике: практика и перспективы // Инновации и инвестиции. 2019. № 11. С. 164–166.

Hanson C., Luedtke S., Spicer N., Sörensen J.S., Mayhew S., Mounier-Jack S. National Health Governance, Science and the Media: Drivers of COVID-19 Responses in Germany, Sweden and the UK in 2020 // British Medical Journal Global Health. 2021. Vol. 6. Is. 12. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006691

Mukhoryanova O.A., Novikova I.V., Rudich S.B., Bogushevich E.V. E-Government in the Western European Countries, Asia and in the USA // Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2016. Vol. 9. Is. 16. DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i16/90757

Suardi I. E-Government, Governance and Corruption in Asian Countries // Emerging Markets Business and Management Studies Journal. 2021. Vol. 8. Is. 2. P. 137–150.

Sultanova G, Subebayeva Z., Aitkulova S., Kendjassarova A. Structural Mechanisms for Implementing Project Management in Government Bodies // Статистика, учет и аудит. 2021. № 1(80). С. 104–108. DOI: 10.51579/1563-2415.2021-1.19

Vephkhvia G. E-government and E-governance: Various or Multifarious Concepts // International Journal of Scientific and Management Research. 2022. Vol. 5. Is. 1. P. 183–196. DOI: 10.37502/IJSMR.2022.5111

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Experience of Project Management in the E-Government Concept Implementation. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 92, 7-23. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/205

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Analysis of Domestic and Foreign Experience of Project Management in the E-Government Concept Implementation. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 92, 7-23. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/205

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 311

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...