Assessment of Human Capital State at the Stage of the Sixth Technological Paradigm: Regional Aspect
Keywords:
Human capital, technological paradigms, innovative development, regional development strategies, development resource, strategic resource, economy multiformityAbstract
The main strategic resource of the current stage of development is human capital, which accumulates the entire intellectual, physiological, labor and social potential of people and possibilities of its use to ensure a stable trend in the development of economic systems in conditions of constant turbulence, increasing uncertainty and technological progress. The key role of human capital as a development resource in the processes of transition to the sixth technological paradigm necessitates the adoption of scientifically sound management decisions regarding the strategy of its formation, use and development, which determines the relevance of this work. The aim of the study is to assess the state of human capital at the regional level, identify trends and factors of its formation with subsequent implementation in the strategy of regional development at the stage of transition to the sixth technological paradigm. To achieve this aim, such general scientific and special methods as analysis and synthesis, comparison, analysis of statistical series, coefficient method, matrix modeling method, expert assessments (Delphi method) were used. The study was conducted on the data and materials of Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat), Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, the official websites of Russian regional governments, various analytical agencies and information portals. The main results of the study include assessing human capital state formed and used at the regional level in the context of its main components, identifying the main reasons for high differentiation of the level of its formation in the conditions of the Russian economy complexity. The scope of the obtained results application is determined by the possibilities of forming strategic programs for regional development, taking into account human potential and the need to equalize the socio-economic situation of the territories.
References
Аузан А.А. Цифровая экономика как экономика: институциональные тренды // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. 2019. № 6. С. 12–19.
Воронов А.С., Леонтьева Л.С., Орлова Л.Н., Сухарева М.А. Общие принципы оценки основных показателей развития человеческого капитала по технологическим укладам // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 21: Управление (государство и общество). 2020. № 3. С. 38–62.
Глазьев С.Ю. Управление развитием экономики: курс лекций. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 2019.
Глазьев С.Ю., Воронов А.С., Леонтьева Л.С., Орлова Л.Н., Сухарева М.А. О формировании человеческого капитала на разных этапах социально-экономического развития // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2020a. № 82. С. 140–170. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2020-10096.
Глазьев С.Ю., Орлова Л.Н., Воронов А.С. Человеческий капитал в контексте развития технологических и мирохозяйственных укладов // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 6: Экономика. 2020b. № 5. С. 3–23.
Лапидус Л.В., Леонтьева Л.С., Гостилович А.О. Минимальная цифровая корзина российских регионов для трансформации промышленности // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2019. № 77. С. 212–228. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2019-10025.
Лосева О.В. Модели формирования и оценки интеллектуального капитала работника в условиях перехода к шестому технологическому укладу // Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. 2019. Т. 15. № 6. С. 32–40.
Тарасова Н.Ю., Машкова А.Л., Савина О.А., Новикова Е.В. Построение сценариев инновационной трансформации отраслевой структуры экономики России с учетом влияния шестого технологического уклада // Друкеровский вестник. 2021. № 2 (40). С. 38–48. DOI: 10.17213/2312-6469-2021-2-38-48.
Becker G.S. Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis // Journal of Political Economy. 1962. Vol. 70. Is. 5. Part 2. P. 9–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/258724.
Driver C., Oughton C. Dynamic Models of Regional Innovation: Explorations with British TimeSeries Data // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2008. Vol. 1. Is. 2. P. 205–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn012.
Helpman E. The Mystery of Economic Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2004.
Lucas R.E. Lectures on Economic Growth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2002.
McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. Modern Regional Innovation Policy // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2013. Vol. 6. Is. 2. P. 187–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rst007.
Rodríguez-Pose A., Wilkie C. Putting China in Perspective: A Comparative Exploration of the Ascent of the Chinese Knowledge Economy // Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 2016. Vol. 9. Is. 3. P. 479–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw018.