Political-Administrative Capacities of Governance in Conditions of Turbulence andUncertainty

Political-Administrative Capacities of Governance in Conditions of Turbulence andUncertainty

Authors

Keywords:

Political-administrative capacities, turbulence, uncertainty, robust governance, sustainable development

Abstract

The aim of the article is to identify the political-administrative governance capacities required for an adequate response to new challenges arising in conditions of turbulence and uncertainty. The article draws attention to the institutional component
of this problem. The understanding of turbulence as a condition that changes the priorities of the governance institutional design is substantiated. The role of institutional uncertainty has been highlighted, when the potential readiness to respond to the action of unknown endogenous and exogenous factors becomes an indispensable element of the institutional design of modern public administration. It has been established that the governance capacities in the new conditions can be structured through distinguishing adaptive, predictive, dynamic and mobilization varieties within the framework of the corresponding typology. The methodological basis of this typology is the model of robust governance. As affirmed by the article there is a revision of traditional criteria for the quality assessment in public administration within the framework of the robust governance model. Instead of efficiency adaptation becomes а new basic criterion that is achieved in conformity with the requirements of flexibility, consistency and coherence implemented in optimal timing strategy for development. In turn, achieving compliance with these requirements depends on the characteristics of governance institutional arrangements. However, political-administrative barriers as a consequence of dysfunctions of the existing institutions and administrative practices can increase endogenous uncertainty. This makes it much harder to adequately respond to external shocks and may at some point create new challenges. The article concludes that overcoming the identified barriers, introducing and strengthening all the mentioned political-administrative capacities of the robust governance will make state institutions more sustainable and resilient for future shocks.

Author Biography

Gennady L. Kupryashin, Lomonosov Moscow State University

DSc (Political Sciences), Professor, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Kupryashin@spa.msu.ru 

References

Алексеев М.А., Фрейдина Е.В., Тропин А.А. Понятийный каркас и модель механизма робастного управления экономическими системами // Вопросы управления. 2018. № 6. С. 72–83.

Блинова Т. Отчет о результатах экспертно-аналитического мероприятия «Стратегический аудит формирования и достижения показателей деятельности федеральных органов исполнительной власти, руководство деятельностью которых осуществляет Правительство Российской Федерации, в 2017–2018 годах и истекшем периоде 2019 года» // Бюллетень Счетной палаты Российской Федерации. 2020. № 1. С. 5–37.

Борщевский Г.А. Институт государственной службы в политической системе российского общества. М.: Юрайт, 2022.

Вилисов М.В., Телин К.О., Филимонов К.Г. От устойчивости к стабильности: что делает «хорошим» государственное управление// Полития. 2020. № 1(96). C. 7–27. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2020-96-1-7-27

Жихаревич Б.С., Жулин А.Б., Зайцев Д.А., Клепач А.Н., Клименко А.В., Ларионов А.В., Прядильников М.В., Якобсон Л.И., Яременко И.А. Планирование и управление по результатам в условиях турбулентности. Круглый стол, 25.10.2022 // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2022. № 4. С. 7–29.

Зарочинцев С.В. «Упреждающее» государственное управление и оценка рисков национальной безопасности // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2021. № 3. С. 200–218.

Полтерович В.М., Дмитриев М.Э., Яковлев А.А., Гурвич Е.Т., Аузан А.А. Судьба экономических программ и реформ в России (Круглый стол в рамках XVIII Апрельской международной научной конференции НИУ ВШЭ) // Вопросы экономики. 2017. № 6. С. 22–44. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-6-22-44

Сморгунов Л.В. Концепция «способностей государства», конструктивизм и развитие теории государственного управления // Государственное управление в XXI в.: традиции и инновации: 6-я ежегодная международная конференция факультета государственного управления МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова (29–31 мая 2008 г.). М.: МАКС Пресс, 2009. C. 403–419.

Ansell Ch., Trondal J. Governing Turbulence: An Organizational-Institutional Agenda // Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. 2017. Vol. 1. Is. 1. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/225894357.pdf

Ansell Ch., Sørensen E., Torfing J. Public Administration and Politics Meet Turbulence: The Search for Robust Governance Responses // Public Administration. 2023. Vol. 1. Is. 1. P. 3–22. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12874

Baehler K.J., Biddle J.C. Governance for Adaptive Capacity and Resilience in the U.S. Water Sector // Ecology and Society. 2018. Vol. 23. Is.4. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10537-230424

Bizikova L., Swanson D., Tyler S., Roy D. & Venema H.D. Policy Adaptability in Practice // Policy Design and Practice. 2018. Vol. 1. Is. 1.

DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2018.1436376

Brugnach M., Dewulf A., Pahl-Wostl C., Taillieu T. Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: About Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know // Ecology and Society. 2008. Vol. 13. Is. 2. URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art30/

Capano G., Toth F. Thinking Outside the Box, Improvisation, and Fast Learning: Designing Policy Robustness to Deal with What Cannot Be Foreseen // Public Administration. 2023. Vol. 101. Is. 1. P. 90–105. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12861

Carstensen M., Sørensen E., Torfing J. Why We Need Bricoleurs to Foster Robust Governance Solutions in Turbulent Times // Public Administration. 2023. Vol. 101. Is. 1. P. 36–52. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12857

Dewulf A., Biesbroe R. Nine Lives of Uncertainty in Decision- Making: Strategies for Dealing with Uncertainty in Environmental Governance // Policy and Society. 2018. Vol. 37. Is. 4. P. 441–458. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484

Duit A. Resilience Thinking: Lessons for Public Administration // Public Administration. 2016. Vol. 94. Is. 27. P. 364–380. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12182

Howlett M. Procedural Policy Tools and the Temporal Dimensions of Policy Design // International Review of Public Policy. 2019. Vol. 1. Is. 1. P. 27–45. DOI: 10.4000/irpp.310

Klijn E.H., Koppenjan J.F.M. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. London: Routledge. 2016. DOI: 10.4324/9781315887098

Olson R., Dunagan J. Introduction to Special Issue: Government Foresight // World Futures Review. 2019. Vol. 11. Is. 3. P. 183–186.

DOI: 10.1177/1946756719839385

Stark A. Bureaucratic Values and Resilience: An Exploration of Crisis Management Adaptation // Public Administration. 2014. Vol. 92. Is.3. P. 692–706. DOI: 10.1111/padm.12085

Downloads

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Political-Administrative Capacities of Governance in Conditions of Turbulence andUncertainty. (2023). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 97, 174-189. https://doi.org/10.24412/1pczz409

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Political-Administrative Capacities of Governance in Conditions of Turbulence andUncertainty. (2023). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 97, 174-189. https://doi.org/10.24412/1pczz409

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

71-80 of 268

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...