Strategic Planning at Federal Level: Main Elements and Structural and Logical Connections

Strategic Planning at Federal Level: Main Elements and Structural and Logical Connections

Authors

  • Raisa N. Shpakova

Keywords:

Strategic planning, strategy, mission, goals, direction, priority, task.

Abstract

A significant problem of the organization of strategic planning is the lack of a unified methodology for the development of strategic planning documents. At the same time, coherence is not achieved between the accepted documents on targets, tasks, and time frames. The author supports the view that it is necessary to adopt a special normative document that removes these contradictions, and, as a contribution to its development, a number of methodological solutions are proposed, without which the development of a unified methodological approach seems problematic. The article summarizes the practice of federal strategic planning (25 current and 5 discontinued federal strategies are analyzed). It has been established that when developing federal strategies, a wide variety of approaches are used to establish consistency and interrelationships between the elements of strategies. The relationship between the elements is unclear or completely absent. In addition, the interpretations of different elements (goals, directions, priorities, tasks) often do not differ, and are also characterized by features not peculiar to these elements. As a result, the strategy turns into an enumeration of all possible common intentions with an indistinctly expressed, and therefore difficult to control end result. The adaptation of the mission concept from corporate strategic management to state management is considered appropriate. The essence of individual elements of the strategic plan is clarified, and their concepts that are absent in federal legislation (such as direction, priority) are formulated. A structural and logical scheme of the strategic plan is proposed, linking all the elements of the plan into a single system — from the mission to the tasks, as well as containing recommendations on the most appropriate placement of these elements in various types of strategic planning documents. The implementation of the proposed approach will help streamline the development and presentation of strategies, make the choice of strategic goals and directions more reasonable.

Author Biography

Raisa N. Shpakova

PhD, Associate Professor
ORCID: 0000-0002-9916-0113
production2003@mail.ru

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russian Federation

References

Бухвальд Е.М. «Основы государственной политики в сфере государственного планирования»: нерешенные проблемы // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2022. № 1. С. 32–49. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2022_1_32_49

Козоногова Е.В., Дубровская Ю.В., Русинова М.Р., Иванов П.В. Оценка соответствия приоритетов стратегического развития регионов их отраслевой специализации на основе Text Mining // Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2022. № 2. С. 106–133. DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-106-133

Ленчук Е.Б. Стратегическое планирование как инструмент ускорения социально-экономического развития России // Планирование в рыночной экономике: воспоминание о будущем. СПб.: ИНИР им. С.Ю. Витте: Центркаталог, 2021. С. 105–111.

Ленчук Е.Б., Филатов В.И. Стратегическое планирование как инструмент снижения неопределенности в условиях глобальной экономической трансформации // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2023. № 4. C. 7–24. DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2023_4_7_24

Мирославская М.В., Кучина А.О., Хайрутдинова Л.И. Актуальные вопросы формирования миссии в рамках стратегического управления крупными промышленными компаниями // Международный журнал гуманитарных и естественных наук. 2018. № 10–2. С. 100–104. DOI: 10.24411/2500-1000-2018-10123

Назаров И.И. Совершенствование системы стратегического планирования национального развития в Российской Федерации // Государственная служба. 2022. № 6. P. 73–81. DOI: 10.22394/2070-8378-2022-24-6-73-81

Семидоцкий В.А., Кутин М.В. Технология целеполагания как элемент механизма стратегического планирования в условиях обострения конкурентной борьбы // Вестник Финансовой Академии. 2010. № 5. С. 57–60.

Суханова А.А. Конституционные ценности в содержании государственных программ Российской Федерации // Сибирское юридическое обозрение. 2022. Т. 19. № 1. С. 39–53. DOI: 10.19073/2658-7602-2022-19-1-39-53

Шпакова Р.Н. Генеральные цели стратегического развития регионов Российской Федерации // Государственное управление. Электронный вестник. 2019. № 77. С. 311–336. DOI: 10.24411/2070-1381-2019-10030

Bordean I., Răileanu A., Turtureanu A.G. Strategic Planning in Public Administration // Proceedings of the Fifth “Administration and Public Management” International Conference: “Public Institutions’ Capacity to Implement the Administrative Reform Process”. Bucharest: Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, 2009. № 14. P. 141–153.

Lenchuk E.B., Voitolovskii F.G., Kuvalin D.B. Strategic Planning in Public Administration: Experience, Opportunities and Prospects // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2020. Vol. 31. P. 621–628. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700720060106

Mishin Yu., Mishin A. Increasing the Level of Justification of State Strategic Planning // SHS Web of Conferences. 2021. Vol. 94. DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20219401013

Strategic Management for Public and Nonprofit Organizations / ed. by A.W. Steiss. New York: Routledge, 2003.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Strategic Planning at Federal Level: Main Elements and Structural and Logical Connections. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 103, 102-114. https://doi.org/10.24412/c8vrr433

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Strategic Planning at Federal Level: Main Elements and Structural and Logical Connections. (2024). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 103, 102-114. https://doi.org/10.24412/c8vrr433

Similar Articles

1-10 of 164

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...