Venture Capital in the Context of ESG Transformation

Venture Capital in the Context of ESG Transformation

Authors

Keywords:

Social reproduction, venture capital, ESG transformation, ESG risks, ESG principles, civilizational transition

Abstract

The relevance of the article is defined by transformation of social reproduction that has begun in accordance with principles of environmental friendliness (E), social responsibility (S) and quality management (G) signifying transition to the VI technological order. This process is actively advancing in financial sphere and has affected sphere of venture capital circulation. The aim of the article is to study signs of a new format of social reproduction in conditions of ESF transformation and systematize ideas about features of ESG principles implementation in sphere of venture capital circulation. The analysis of foreign and domestic studies allowed concluding that ESG transformation is a sign of a new format of social reproduction, main features of which, along with Industry 4.0, digitalization, decarbonization, protectionism, sanctions, etc. are the following: the completion of evolutionary stage of capitalist socio-economic formation; the increasing influence of economic and labor migration on regime of natural reproduction and architecture of political relations; the expansion of network organization of intra-production processes which entails displacement of market mechanisms and fragments the spatial placement of technologically complex goods through formation of global value chains; the creation of supranational regulatory bodies and the “glocalization” of reproduction. The article analyzes state of global ESG borrowing market and evolution of investors’ approaches to choosing an investment object, which allowed us to conclude that investment policy of states and regions, as well as the sphere of investment and venture capital has shifted to ESG principles, to identify the reasons for the surge of venture investments in India and increased attention investors to ESG in Anglo-Saxon countries. The main ESG risks and their causes in venture business, which can be destructive for economy and society, are identified; problems and tasks that stand in the way of incorporation of ESG principles in field of venture investment are described; the experience of implementing ESG in activities of a venture fund is summarized. As a result, it is concluded that it is necessary to form a formalized structure and methodology for measuring effectiveness of ESG.

Author Biographies

Marianna V. Kudina, Lomonosov Moscow State University

DSc (Economics), Professor, Head of Department of Economics of Innovative Development, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

kudina@spa.msu.ru

Azret Sh. Kasymov, Lomonosov Moscow State University

PhD applicant, School of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation.

azrksmov@gmail.com

References

Бодрунов С.Д. Энгельс и XXI век: концептуализируя будущее // Вопросы политической экономии. 2021. № 1. C. 22–29. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4666045

Варнавский В.Г. Управление крупномасштабными экономическими системами на фоне ухудшения условий общественного воспроизводства // Сборник трудов XIII Всероссийского совещания по проблемам управления ВСПУ-2019. М.: Институт проблем управления им. В.А. Трапезникова РАН, 2019. С. 2239–2242.

Довбий И.П. Формирование механизма кредитования инновационной деятельности. Челябинск: Издательский центр ЮУрГУ, 2010.

Довбий И.П., Кобылякова В.В., Минкин А.А. ESG-переход как новая парадигма глобальной экономики и устойчивых финансов // Вестник ЮУрГУ. Серия «Экономика и менеджмент». 2022. Т. 16. № 1. С. 77–86. DOI: 10.14529/em220107

Корняков В.И. Воспроизводство как поток единой субстанции: зависимости, модель, объемные структуры. М.; Ярославль: [б.и.], 2000.

Нешитой А.С., Иванов М.Ю. К управлению экономикой: востребованность теории общественного воспроизводства // Инвестиции в России. 2022. № 3 (326). С. 11–15.

Павленко Ю.Г. Политэкономия социального государства в контексте государственного патернализма. М.: Институт экономики РАН, 2021.

Парсонс Т. О структуре социального действия. М.: Академический проект, 2000.

Плотникова Е.П. Венчурный капитал в системе общественного капитала: постановка проблемы // Вестник Оренбургского государственного университета. 2010. № 8 (114). C. 41–46.

Солдатова Р.Н. Прорыв в будущее // Многоуровневое общественное воспроизводство: вопросы теории и практики. 2021. № 20(36). С. 15–25.

Солдатова Р.Н. Россия на пороге XXI века: выбор пути // Перспективы социально-экономического развития России: возможности выбора третьего пути, возможности гармонии: в 2 т. Иваново: Иван. гос. текст. акад., 2009. Т. 1. С. 88–98.

Шамрай Л.В., Леденева М.В. Глобальные цепочки добавленной стоимости в мировом воспроизводственном процессе // Бизнес. Образование. Право. 2015. № 3. С. 114–120.

Яковлев И.А., Кабир Л.С. Механизм финансирования «зеленых» инвестиций как элемент национальной стратегии финансирования устойчивого развития // Финансовый журнал. 2018. № 3 (43). С. 9–20. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2018-3-9-20

Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper and Row, 1953.

Clarkson M. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance // Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20. Is. 1. P. 92–117.

Cohen R. IMPACT — Reshaping Capitalism to Drive Real Change. London: Ebury Press, 2020.

Davis K. Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities? // California Management Review. 1960. Vol. 2. Is. 3. Р. 70–76. DOI: 10.2307/41166246

Freeman R.E. Stakeholder Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing, 1984.

Manne H.G., Wallich H.C. The Modern Corporation and Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1972.

Pollman E. Quasi Governments and Inchoate Law: Berle’s Vision of Limits on Corporate Power // Seattle University Law Review. 2019. Vol. 42. Р. 617–639.

Schwartz M., Carroll A. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2003. Vol. 13. Is. 4. P. 503–530. DOI: 10.5840/beq200313435

Sinn H.-W. Ist Deutschland noch zu retten? Berlin: Ullstein, 2005.

Swanson D.L. Toward an Integrative Theory of Business and Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance // Academy of Management Review. 1999. Vol. 24. Is. 3. P. 506–521.

Wood D.J. Corporate Social Performance Revisited // The Academy of Management Review. 1991. Vol 16. Is. 4. P. 691–718.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Venture Capital in the Context of ESG Transformation. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 93, 22-37. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/160

Issue

Section

Scientific articles

Categories

How to Cite

Venture Capital in the Context of ESG Transformation. (2022). Public Administration. E-Journal (Russia), 93, 22-37. https://spajournal.ru/index.php/spa/article/view/160

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 182

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...