Effectiveness of the Russian Far East Regulation Tools
Keywords:
Public administration, regional policy, the Far East, preferential regime, territory of advanced developmentAbstract
The article presents an econometric analysis of the current set of government regulation tools in order to assess their socio-economic effect for the development of the Far East (preferential business regimes, measures of budgetary and tax support for priority industries). The study is based on a combination of quantitative methods (regression and correlation analysis, modeling, method of means, index method, difference-in-differences method, factor analysis) and qualitative methods (document analysis, case study, benchmarking, classification, and SWOT-analysis). As a result, an index of the Far East socio-economic development is proposed. Moreover, it is revealed that the federal regulation of the Far East development after 2014 produces a multiplier effect and, in general, has a positive impact. Some of the managerial tools (e.g. territories of advanced development) had no significant influence, which is explained by both miscalculations in regulation and a delayed effect. Forecasting showed that in the medium term, the most likely for the Russian Far East is the scenario of moderate growth. The research allowed formulating proposals to improve the efficiency of regulation. First, the sectoral tools should be integrated to provide comprehensive spatial regulation. Second, each tool should provide for the possibility of statistical evaluation. Third, it is necessary to justify the introduction of new instruments and monitor the achievement of the stated goals for them. Forth, monitoring should be carried out not only for the instruments in action, but also after their completion.
References
Аганбегян А.Г. Развитие Дальнего Востока: национальная программа в контексте национальных проектов // Пространственная экономика. 2019. Т. 15. № 3. С. 165–181. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.3.165-181
Зубаревич Н.В. Регионы России в новых экономических условиях // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2022. № 3(55). C. 226–234. DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-55-3-15
Леонов С.Н. Преференциальные режимы созданных локальных точек роста и их влияние на экономику Дальнего Востока // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. 2020. Т. 13. № 3. С. 28–45. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.3
Минакир П.А. Восточный вектор развития: новые возможности и ожидания // Регионалистика. 2023. Т. 10. № 1. С. 67–73.
DOI: 10.14530/reg.2023.1.67
Antonova N.E., Lomakina N.V. Institutional Innovations for the Development of the East of Russia: Effects of Implementation in the Resource Region // Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences. 2020. Vol. 13. Is. 4. P. 442–452. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0580
Gurkov I., Kokorina A., Saidov. Z. Russian Territories of Outrunning Development in Mono Cities: Current and Prospective Opportunities for Foreign Investment into Manufacturing // Journal of East-West Business. 2020. Vol. 26. Is. 4. P. 365–390. DOI: 10.1080/10669868.2020.1769794
Hirofumi A. New Instruments Attracting Investment into the Russian Far East: Preliminary Assessment // Пространственная экономика. 2019. Т. 15. № 1. С. 157–169. DOI: 10.14530/se.2019.1.157-169
Min J., Kang B. Promoting New Growth: ‘Advanced Special Economic Zones’ in the Russian Far East // Russia’s Turn to the East: Domestic Policymaking and Regional Cooperation / ed. by H. Blakkisrud, E.W. Rowe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. P. 51–74.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69790-1_4
Parwez S.A. Review of Special Economic Zone Led to Detrimental Implications: An Indian Experience // Emerging Economy Studies. 2020. Vol. 6. Is. 2. P. 179–190. DOI: 10.1177/2394901520977424
Walker R.M., Lee M.J., James O., Ho S.M.Y. Analyzing the Complexity of Performance Information Use: Experiments with Stakeholders to Disaggregate Dimensions of Performance, Data Sources, and Data Types // Public Administration Review. 2018. Vol. 78. Is. 1.
DOI: 10.1111/puar.12920